[ Home ] [ Research ] [ News ] [ Pictures ] [ Resume ] [ Links ] [EWR ] [Guestbook ]
|
|
Destruction of Perchlorate and Nitrate in Spent
Ion-Exchange Brine Ion-exchange technology often produces large volumes of spent brine containing high concentrations of contaminant, which can be difficult or cost prohibitive to process. A new class of zero-valent iron nanoparticles stabilized with starch or cellulose can degrade perchlorate or nitrate in spent ion exchange brine in an environmentally safe manner, something not possible by current techniques. Overview |
|
|
In-situ
Immobilization/Containment of Mercury in Contaminated Soils and
Sediments When mercury enters water and sediments, it can undergo numerous transformation processes, of which mercury methylation is a top environmental concern. Auburn inventors have developed an innovative method to effectively prevent the formation of methylated mercury. This technology modifies nanoscale iron sulfide particles at production by adding a low cost stabilizer to prevent particle aggregation, thereby maintaining their high surface area and reactivity. Overview |
Perchlorate
(ClO4-) is an anion contaminant in ground water and surface water when the
salts ammonium, potassium, magnesium, or sodium perchlorate dissolved in
water. Ammonium perchlorate is a main ingredient of solid rockets and
missiles fuel. It has also been found in air bag inflators, manufacture of
matches, analytical chemistry ingredients, nuclear reactors, electronic
tubes, lubricating oils, leather tanning and finishing activities, fabrics
and dye fixers, electroplating, aluminum refining, rubber manufacture, paint
and enamel production. In the recent years, perchlorate has been widely
detected at dangerous levels in drinking water in at least 22 states
including Alabama (EPA 2003). Drinking water for more than 20 million
Americans is contaminated with this toxic legacy of the Cold War (EWR, 2003a
)
Investigations show that perchlorate poses a variety of health problem to
human body, especially in children, newborns and pregnant women. It can
cause both physical and mental retardation and has been linked to thyroid
cancer (EPA 2003). Perchlorate interferes with iodide uptake into the
thyroid gland. Because iodide is an essential component of thyroid hormones,
perchlorate disrupts how the thyroid functions. EPA??s draft analysis of
perchlorate toxicity is that perchlorate??s disruption of iodide uptake is
the key event leading to changes in development or tumor formation (EPA
2003). Considering the potential health risk, a maximum contaminant level (MCL)
of 1 ppb has been recommended by EPA. But because of the strong opposition
from DoD, NASA, and DOE, the National Academy of Science (NAS) was asked to
review the data and suggest a final verdict in mid-2004.
PERCHLORATE CHEMISTRY
The
chemical characteristics of perchlorate make it very unusual. Perchlorate is
a highly soluble inorganic anion (2.09 kg/L for NaClO4?C) (Logan, 2001) that
adsorbs poorly to mineral surfaces and activated carbon and is not retarded
during groundwater transport. In the solid state, the perchlorate anion has
been determined by X-ray diffraction to have a nearly perfect tetrahedral
geometry with the four oxygen atoms at the vertices and the chlorine atom at
the center . In aqueous solution, the geometry is probably perfectly
tetrahedral.
Perchlorate
is present in water as ClO4- oxyanion. Although chlorine is at its highest
oxidation state and the reduction potential is high, perchlorate is actually
unusually stable in water due to the high activation energy barrier.
Perchlorate is so persistent that it has been detected in milk of numerous
Texas grocery stores at concentrations ranging from 1.7-6.4 ppb (Kirk et al,
2003). High concentrations of perchlorate were also detected in lettuce in
southern California (Jacobs, 2003). Another characteristic of perchlorate is
its high polarizability, witch makes perchlorate very difficult to be
detected. Before 1997, only concentrations greater than 100ppb could be
detected by Ion Chromatograph (IC), which explains partially why the toxic
effects of perchlorate at lower concentrations were largely ignored of many
decades. In March 1997, the California Department of Health Services (CDHS)
developed a ground breaking method that lowered the detection limit to 4
ppb, which immediately triggered a nationwide interest in re-evaluation of
the health and ecological risks associated with low concentration of
perchlorate spearheaded by the US EPA. In 1998, the Dionex Cooperation
invented the new AS-11 IC column, which further lowered the detection limit
to < 1 ppb, which essentially eliminated the analytical barriers for
regulating perchlorate to a very low level. Another unique and maybe most
important property of perchlorate is that despite its high water solubility
perchlorate is actually much more hydrophobic than most other inorganic
anions such as sulfate, chloride and nitrate, namely, it is also very
soluble in polar organic solvents (Urbansky,1998)
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
In order to
find efficient technologies to prevent perchlorate from sweeping into
drinking water and other water resource, a lot of research about ion
exchange, granular activated carbon (GAC), biological processes, membrane
filtration, chemical reduction, electrochemical processes, phytoremediation
have been done. Based on the results of past years, there currently are two
promising technologies used to treat large volumes of water that contain
perchlorate:
ion exchange
and anaerobic
biological treatment(Logan,
2001; CWQ, 2003).
Under
anaerobic conditions, Perchlorate can be biodegraded serving as an electron
acceptor. A number of microorganism have been identified to have capability
to reduce perchlorate. Bacteria capable of perchlorate degradation appear to
be widely distributed in nature at concentrations ranging from one to
thousands of bacteria per gram of water, wastewater, sediment, and soil.
Perchlorate is used as an electron acceptor by some bacteria for cellular
respiration and is degraded completely to chloride ion. The bacteria that
degrade perchlorate are diverse. Almost all of them fall within new
species?? classifications based on a 16s rDNA classification scheme??a
recombinant DNA methodology based on the 16s gene, which can be used to
assess the phylogeny of bacteria. Most perchlorate-respiring microorganisms
(PRMs) are capable of functioning under varying environmental conditions and
use oxygen, nitrate, and chlorate (ClO3?C)??but not sulfate??as a terminal
electron acceptor. Perchlorate can be successively degraded to chlorate and
then chlorite (ClO2?C) by a novel chlorate reductase respiratory enzyme. A
chlorate-respiring bacterium was the first isolate shown to be capable of
benzene degradation, although only under denitrifying, and not
chlorate-reducing, conditions (Logan,2001). A lot of biological reactors
have been investigated for perchlorate removal. Most of these systems are
attached growth reactors using either granular activated carbon(GAC) or
sand, and are able to remove perchlorate to very low levels. A variety of
donors including ethanol, methanol, acetate, hydrogen and cheese whey have
been utilized in these reactors.
While
biological processes have been widely used for municipal wastewater
treatment for its low cost and good environmental friendliness, treating
contaminated drinking water using biological processes is rather scarce
primarily due to 1) bacteria activities may generate additional odor, taste
and other undesirable by-products, 2) the organic contents and nutrient in
drinking are usually too low to warrant efficient degradation rate, and 3)
reproduction of bacteria creates an additional disinfection demand.
Ion
exchange is the most commonly used physical chemical removal technology to
handle perchlorate problem. Many anion exchange resins are commercially
available to reduce perchlorate to safe level in drinking water. And a
number of full-scale treatment facilities have been built up to treat
perchlorate-contaminated drinking water and groundwater in California and
other states. In contrast with biological processes, ion exchange process in
general possess the following advantages: 1) it is rather simple (fixed-bed
has been the typical process configuration as shown in Figure*), 2) its
maintence and operation are rather straightforward and can be automated, 3)
no harmful by-product will be produced, 4) ion exchange resin can be reused
for many cycles after regeneration, 5) it can be easily inserted in an
existing treatment process. However, this technology confronts the following
obstacles: 1) although satisfactory sorption capacity was observed with some
commercial resins, regenerability of resins have been found extremely poor,
making it cost prohibitive, 2) associated with the poor regenerability,
large volumes of process waste residuals (spent regenerant) are produced and
need to be further disposed of, and 3) no perchlorate specific sorbent has
been developed, i.e., the sorption of perchlorate is severely retarded by
other anions such as sulfate, nitrate and dissolved natural organic matter
(NOM) in water. Consequently, the key breakthrough in applying ion exchange
technology calls for a novel ion exchange resin that has high selectivity
for perchlorate and high and efficient regenerability.
POLYMERIC LIGAND EXCHANGE
The ligand
exchange technology was firstly conceived and developed by Fred Helfferich
in 1961 (Walton, 1995). It combines two fields of chemistry, namely, ion
exchange and coordination chemistry, in order to accomplish a task that
neither could do alone. The advantage of ligand exchange over other
chromatographic techniques is that complex formation is, as a rule, a much
stronger interaction than ordinary physical sorption or ion exchange.
Because of the strong tendency of the ligand to form complexes with the
metal in the resin, almost the full ligand-exchange capacity is utilized
even if the ligand concentration in the external solution is very low. And
the complexes of various even rather similar ligands with a properly chosen
metal ion usually differ considerably in their strengths. Accordingly, high
selectivities can be attained (Helfferich, 1962).
During the
past years, Zhao and SenGupta made an intensive investigation on a new class
of polymeric ligand exchanges for highly effective removal of various
oxyanions including phosphate, chromate and arsenate from water (Zhao et
al,1995). They also patented a PLE-based treatment process, which has been
employed at a number of sites worldwide. As shown in Figure2, the new anion
exchanger is a polymeric ligand exchanger which consists of the followings:
first, a cross-linked polystyrene-divinylbenzene matrix; second, covalently
attached chelating functional groups containing nitrogen donor atoms; and
third, a Lewis acid cation (e.g., Cu2+) coordinated to the chelating
functional group in a manner that its positive charges are not neutralized.
Consequently, the performance of a PLE will be affected by properties and
chemistry of the metal-housing polymer (e. g., porosity, pore size
distribution, hydrophobicity, and surface area), the reactivity of the
chelating functionality and the reactivity of the immobilized metal. Unlike
conventional standard ion exchange resins, the PLE employs the loaded metal
as its functionality. Since the metal can interact with the target ligand
(e. g., perchlorate) through concurrent Lewis acid-base interaction (i. e.,
surface complexation) and electrostatic interactions (ion pairing) and since
such metal-ligand interaction can be readily manipulated, the PLE offers
unparalleled advantages over standard resins with respect to both
selectivity enhancement and regenerability.
The PLEs showed unusually high selectivity and sorption capacity toward oxyanionic contaminants such as arsenate, chromate, phosphate, and trichlorophenol even in the presence of high concentrations of common anions such as sulfate, nitrate, and dissolved NOM (Zhao et al,1995; Zhao and SenGupta, 1998; 2000). Note that both electrostatic interaction and ion-pairing (IP), and Lewis acid-base (LAB) are concurrently operative. The PLE??s high selectivity for the target ligands results from the synergy of various concurrent specific interactions between the target ligands and metal functional groups including the metal-ligand complexation or Lewis acid-base interaction, electrostatic (cation-anion) interactions, and hydrophobic interactions for hydrophobic contaminants such as trichlorophenol and perchlorate.