ELECTROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SULFUR-TREATED DIAMOND

 

Sally C. Eaton,* Alfred B. Anderson, John C. Angus

Case Western Reserve University

Cleveland, OH 44106 USA

 

Yulia E. Evstefeeva, Yuri V. Pleskov

Frumkin Institute of Electrochemistry

Moscow, 117071 Russia

 

ABSTRACT

 

The electrochemical properties of sulfur-treated diamond were explored.  Growth of diamond with H2S present in the source gases and treatment of diamond in the absence of growth with a sulfur-containing plasma were performed.  In both cases, Mott-Schottky analysis showed evidence of donor centers.  Measurements of open-circuit potentials in the presence of UV irradiation and measurements of the thermoelectric effect also showed n-type conductivity.  The presence of sulfur was confirmed by particle induced x-ray emission (PIXE).  The donor activity of the sulfur may arise from surface states or grain boundaries rather than sulfur incorporated substitutionally into the bulk of the diamond.  Preliminary evidence indicates that boron may facilitate the attachment of sulfur onto the growing diamond surface and hence aid its incorporation into diamond.

 

Keywords: Diamond films; n-type conductivity; Sulfur-doping; Mott-Schottky plots

 

INTRODUCTION

 

 Boron has long been used as a p-type dopant in diamond, but a viable n-type dopant remains elusive.  For n-type conductivity, several substitutional impurities have been investigated.  Nitrogen is a deep thermal donor at 1.6 eV below the conduction band; phosphorus has a donor level about 0.6 eV below the conduction band and a mobility of 100 cm2/V-s (ref. 1).  Recently, sulfur has been reported to give n-type conductivity (refs. 2,3).  However, other measurements have indicated that the samples contained boron and were p-type (ref. 4).  The experiments described here were motivated by the possibility of co-doping diamond with boron and sulfur to produce n-type conductivity.

 

EXPERIMENTAL

 

Growth experiments

In this work, diamond films were grown in an ASTeX microwave reactor using H2S as the sulfur source.  The methane concentration ranged from 0.1 - 0.4%; the S/C atomic ratio from 15 to 20,000 ppm.  In some experiments, co-doping of sulfur and boron was attempted by including trimethylboron (TMB) in the source gases.  Single crystal diamond with {111}, {110}, {100} faceting and n-type silicon wafers were used as substrates.  The gas flow was 200 sccm, the pressure was 25 torr, and the microwave power was 1020 W.  Substrate temperatures were measured using an optical pyrometer (Williamson 8220C) and ranged from 700 to 750oC.  The samples were analyzed for sulfur by Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS) and Particle-Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE).  Gold-capped titanium contacts were annealed under vacuum up to 400oC for two hours to create ohmic junctions when required.  Electrochemical measurements were conducted in a cell filled with 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte solution, using a Ag/AgCl reference electrode.  Differential capacitance measurements were conducted with an EG&G Instruments Potentiostat, Model No. 283, and EG&G Instruments Frequency Response Detector, Model No. 1025.

The growth experiments proceeded in two distinct stages.  Prior to the first set of growth experiments, the chamber was dismantled, cleaned, and reassembled.  In the first set of experiments, no boron was used in the feed gas, and it is believed that there was no significant amount of boron in the reactor.  Analysis by SIMS of diamond grown in the reactor showed no increase in boron concentration above background levels.  PIXE analysis of diamond samples grown under these conditions gave no detectable sulfur-incorporation when H2S was included in the source gas.  Additionally, most samples were too resistive for electrochemical measurements.

The second set of experiments began after boron (as TMB) was introduced to the reactor.  The reactor was not disassembled and cleaned between these runs so there were low levels of boron present even when TMB was not added to the source gases.  Residual gas analysis showed the presence of BH3 in runs done in the absence of TMB.  In this second set of runs, i.e., after boron was introduced to the reactor, sulfur could be observed by PIXE.  Sulfur was observed in diamond grown on {111}, {110}, and {100} surfaces.  Figure 1 shows a PIXE analysis for a {110} sample. 

When TMB and H2S are both used in the feed gases, the resulting diamond films are p-type.  The Mott-Schottky plots show a negative slope, indicative of p-type carriers with a non-compensated acceptor concentration ranging from 1018 to 1021 cm-3.  A representative example is shown in Figure 2, which has a flat-band potential at 0.43 V vs. Ag/AgCl.  This flat band potential is about 1V more negative than is observed on diamond grown with no sulfur present in the source gas.  (See Figure 5.)  If TMB was not added to the feed gas, then the samples grown using H2S are generally n-type.  The Mott-Schottky plots show a positive slope, which denotes n-type conductivity.  The slopes indicated donor concentrations that ranged from 1014 to 1021 cm-3.  A representative Mott-Schottky plot of one of these samples is shown in Figure 3. 

Figure 1.  PIXE results: counts in arbitrary units versus energy in keV.  H-ion energy was 3 MeV with a 22.5o  incident angle.  The sulfur peak occurs at 2.31 keV.  The substrate was a (110) diamond.  Growth conditions were S/C atomic ratio in the gas phase of 1250 ppm, a methane concentration of 0.2% and residual boron in the reactor.  Film thickness was 14 microns. 


Figure 2.  Mott-Schottky plot, C-2 vs. E, from a (111) diamond surface.  Growth conditions were S/C atomic ratio in the gas phase of 2500 ppm, a B/S atomic ratio of 0.4, and methane concentration of 0.2%.  The negative slope indicates p-type conductivity.  The number of acceptors, NA, is 5 x 1021 cm-3. The electrolyte is 0.5 M H2SO4.

 

Figure 3.  Mott-Schottky plot, C-2 vs. E, from (110) diamond surface.  Growth conditions were S/C atomic ratio of 1250 ppm, methane concentration of 0.2% and residual boron in the reactor.  The positive slope indicates n-type conductivity.  The number of donors, ND, is 4 x 1017 cm-3. The electrolyte is 0.5 M H2SO4. 

 


Plasma treatment experiments

Other experiments were performed in which diamond substrates were treated in an H2/H2S plasma at 25 torr for 12 hours without CH4 in the feed gas.  There were some residual hydrocarbons in the chamber however.  These samples exhibited some of the same electrical properties as samples in which diamond growth occurred in the presence of H2S.  For example, a virgin diamond macle treated for 12 hours with a hydrogen plasma containing 13 ppm H2S gave an n-type Mott Schottky plot with a donor concentration of close to 1021 cm-3.  This is shown in Figure 4.

 

Figure 4.  Mott Schottky plot, C-2 vs. E, from a virgin diamond macle (111) surface treated with a H2/H2S plasma containing 13 ppm H2S for 12 hours.

 

Treatment of boron-doped diamonds with a sulfur containing plasma was also performed.  A Mott-Schottky plot from a typical heavily boron-doped diamond is shown in Figure 4.  The slope indicates p-type conduction with an acceptor concentration of 2x1019 cm-3; the intercept gives a flat band potential of about 1.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl.  The macle of Figure 4 was then treated under a H2/H2S plasma for 12 hours; the results are shown in Figure 5.  The maximum at » 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl was reproducible and has been seen in other samples.  This type of behavior has been observed in other systems by others and can arise from several causes: the presence of rapid surface states located in the band gap (ref. 5) or the presence of more than one donor or acceptor level. 

 

Other Measurements

The response of the open-circuit photo-potential under ultraviolet illumination at 254 nm was also tested and these experiments confirmed the Mott-Schottky results.  Samples that showed n-type Mott-Schottky behavior had a negative shift in the open circuit photo-potential and p-type samples had a positive shift as expected.

 

Figure 5. Mott-Schottky plot, C-2 vs. E, from a heavily B-doped diamond film grown on a (111) diamond macle surface.  The number of acceptors, NA, is 2.3 x 1019 cm-3. The electrolyte is 0.5 M H2SO4.

 

Figure 6. Mott-Schottky plot of macle from Figure 4 after treatment in a H2/H2S plasma containing 13 ppm H2S for 12 hours.  The electrolyte is 0.5 M H2SO4.


Measurements of the sign of the thermoelectric effect were also performed.  These measurements were done using a two-point probe in which one of the probes was heated several tens of degrees above room temperature by a very small resistance heater wound around the probe.  Both probes were tungsten.  The sign of the thermoelectric effect was determined by measuring the voltage deflection when the heater was turned on.  The system was tested using known samples of n-type and p-type silicon and with pure copper metal.  For the n-type silicon samples, the cool probe was negative relative to the warm probe; for p-type samples the cool probe was positive relative to the warm probe. Copper gave no detectable signal.  All diamond samples that showed n-type Mott Schottky plots also showed n-type thermoelectric effect; all p-type diamond samples showed a p-type thermoelectric effect.

 

 

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

 

The results can be summarized as follows.  Sulfur incorporation, in or on diamond, was enhanced by the presence of boron.  Secondly, n-type behavior was only observed when sulfur was used, either during growth or in a post-growth plasma treatment, and when only residual amounts of boron were present in the reactor.  The observation of n-type conductivity following plasma treatment with sulfur in the absence of appreciable growth is indication that surface states or near-surface structures play a role in the observed n-type behavior.  This does not preclude the possibility that donor centers may also arise from substitutional sulfur or sulfur at grain boundaries.  Recent calculations by Albu (ref. 6) indicate that substitutional S and substitutional BS centers are deep donors, with levels that each lie about 1.5 eV below the conduction band. 

The co-doping experiments with boron and sulfur were motivated by elementary strain energy considerations that suggest that the smaller boron atom may facilitate the incorporation of the larger sulfur atom into diamond.  Also, gas-phase equilibrium calculations and Langmuir adsorption calculations show that the sulfur concentration on the growing surface is increased by the presence of boron.  These calculations indicate that gas phase radical species such as BS and BS2 can increase the sulfur concentration on the surface by up to two orders of magnitude by bonding to diamond surface radicals. 

In the second group of experiments, residual boron was present in the reactor even when TMB was not added to the source gases.  The wide variation in the observed number of donors may be due to different levels of compensation of the sulfur by the residual boron.  Two boron atoms are required to compensate doubly ionized sulfur; however, boron is more easily incorporated into diamond than sulfur.

It should be noted that in some cases the doping levels in the diamond may have been too high to meet the assumptions inherent in the Mott-Schottky analysis.  Also, as noted, surface states can influence the results.  Therefore, the values of the carrier concentrations obtained from the plots must be treated as approximations.

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

The support of the National Science Foundation (Grant CHE98-16345) and the Civilian Research and Development Foundation (Grant RC1-2053) is gratefully acknowledged.  Mr. Cliff Hayman designed and constructed the thermoelectric device.

 

REFERENCES

 

1.  Koizumi, S; Teraji, T.; and Kanda, H.: Phosphorus-doped chemical vapor deposition of diamond.  Diam. and Relat. Mater. 9, 3-6, April-May 2000, 935-940.

2.  Sakaguchi, I., et al.: Sulfur: A Donor Dopant for n-type Diamond Semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B. 60, 4, July 1999, 2139-2141.

3.  Nishitani-Gamo, M., et al.:  Homoepitaxial Diamond Growth with Sulfur-Doping by Microwave Plasma-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition. Thin Solid Films, 382, 1-2, Feb. 2001, 113-123.

4.  Kalish, R.,et al.: Is Sulfur a Donor in Diamond? App. Phys. Lett., 76, 6, Feb. 2000, 757-759.

5.  Barrai, G.; Njanjo-Eyoki, F.; and Maximovitch, S.: Characterization of the Passive Layer and of Hydroxide Deposits of Nickel by Impedance Spectroscopy. Electrochim. Acta 40, 17, 1995, 2815-2828.

6. Albu, T.; Anderson, A. B.; and Angus, J. C.: Extended Abstract, 2001 Joint International Meeting of the Electrochemical Society and the International Society of Electrochemistry, San Francisco, September 2-7, 2001



* Email: sce@po.cwru.edu, Phone: 216-368-2648, Fax: 216-368-3016